“Okay, but first read my letter maybe? I’m too shy to say it out loud,”
Alankrita brought her hand forward, a sheet of neatly folded paper
pressed between her fingers. The overcast sky roared in deep grey. Her
face gave away everything that her words would proclaim later, in the
sugary language of love letters. This was possibly the worst time to
tell her that I was dating men, but I knew that it had now become
unavoidable. So, I came out to her in haste. She snatched the paper back
and tore it to pieces. I sat there, dead silent, as she recovered from
her shock, until we gradually began to talk. At that time, my sexuality
was a fiercely protected secret between myself and my three very close
friends. Alankrita was not a part of that circle as I felt that she
would break ties with me if she knew. When she finally came to know, she
felt betrayed that I had deemed her unworthy of my truth; of something
that I had shared with others but kept from her. It had begun to drizzle
by now, and the water poured heavier as we spoke. To the passers-by, we
were a boy and a girl, soggy in July rain, lodged on a green bench
under a huge tree. My head was on her shoulder. For the two hours that
we were there, we received sly stares, repeated glances and policing
gaze, as any romantic couple would.
For several weeks after, Alankrita kept saying, “I feel so foolish.”
She was embarrassed because she felt she had misread the tension between
us, the closeness whenever we were together. But had she been foolish?
We shared the kind of trust and intimacy that she had never experienced
with a straight man. We also shared a sensuousness. I liked how
affectionately we touched each other. If she were a man, such physical
proximity would probably have contained sexual expectations in my mind
as well. Simply because we didn’t enter a ‘relationship’, didn’t mean
that all that eroticism got washed away. But my coming out forced her to
put our relationship in a different box – because that’s how our social
relationships are pre-sorted.
At the National Institute of Technology, getting ‘proposed’ to was a
rite of passage. If a boy and a girl grew close, the slightest pull of
erotic tension would be followed by the obvious next step – a proposal.
Relationships were noticed and speculated about, with all kinds of
gossip, because that’s also how society works. Since I wasn’t out as
gay, it would be assumed I was straight. I soon realized that this was
only a localized version of how most of the world recognized romantic
coupled relationships. They were seen as the closest companionships
there could be. Friendships came after that; a side-dish, not the main
course. The ‘friend-zone’ was where people imprisoned friends they did
not desire, which seemed to easily mean ‘undesirable’. Eroticism was not
supposed to exist within a friendship. Eroticism wasn’t a thing, unless
it was followed by a conventional sexual act. Sex, even between
conventional partners, was an obstacle course where people would cover
‘bases’. Everyone swore by these rules, and tried to put things back in
place when they were flouted.
With Alankrita, sensuality was now out-of-place in our relationship
because I had rejected her desire to date me. To fit this new
definition, our friendship shrunk so much that it lost its identity, and
eventually ended. But by the time Alankrita and I parted ways, my head
was full of questions — Where did the act of sex begin? Why was all the
focus on how far we went when we were attracted to someone? What about
how fully you feel? Was desire and sensuality only about the body? Was
it always supposed to lead up to something carnal – a linear progression
of sex – or could it exist just by itself? Why could we not imagine
serious companionship with a friend? I began to think about desire
itself – the emotional and physical universe within which it existed.
And as I stepped further into the complex world of friendships, the way I
thought about sex, desire, and love changed.
After this, whenever I grew close to a girl, I would end up telling
her about my sexuality. This was not only to be candid about myself and
strengthen our friendship, but also to pre-emptively control ‘other’
feelings surfacing and floating like a sexy mist in the friendship. It
was a bad attempt at trying to emulate what I imagined ‘good’ (read: not
clouded by sexualness) friendships looked like. Then, I met Anchal.
Anchal and I met through the dramatics society, where we wrote,
acted, and directed together. We began to unravel ourselves freely in
our daily exchanges, on the way back to the hostel from rehearsal. We
would go out on long walks, hold hands in moments of joy, reveal secrets
on tense nights, hug openly in the middle of the street, make elaborate
gifts for birthdays, and present each other with flirtatious
compliments. I wasn’t anxious when I came out to her. Like those before
her, she thought that it was going to be a proposal of sorts. But she
was open in accepting what followed. “Arey Adi, ab saath mein ladkey
taadengey!”
The blood surged to my face when I heard her response. It felt
intimate to share with her something so private, especially because we
could now speak about our desires and fantasies in the company of each
other. This was something I had never done with anyone earlier. I began
to find more comfort in her presence because we could do all this
without panicking over what our relationship was supposed to be – or not
be. We were not interested in naked sex, or a sexual ‘conclusion’, for
the lack of a better term. But the eroticism that was conceived during
our moonlit walks stayed – we craved to be in physical proximity of each
other, do things together, express attraction, and seek each other’s
approval. We were often teased as a couple because that is what we were
seen to be. It felt exciting to be associated with each other in that
way, and we loved hearing all kinds of insinuations about us. Anchal and
I did not try to morph this into a ‘sisterhood’ or delete parts of our
affection-attraction to fit the gay-boy-and-straight-girl friendship
stereotypes. It didn’t feel necessary. It didn’t feel accurate. Her
first boyfriend would categorise us in this way. Perhaps it was denial,
or perhaps it was a way to accommodate the relationship without anxiety.
It was never so with the straight men I became friends with. I had to
withdraw myself from these men very soon. Even when I was simply
talking to them, my brain kept playing iterations of ‘mind the gap’ as I
spoke. It was not that mutual eroticism was missing here. I was once
preparing for an improv show with a guy friend, and most scenes we
played ended up becoming close encounters between us. In the course of
the rehearsal, we performed a ballroom dance without knowing how it was
done, breathing over each other’s necks until we were almost hugging.
Then we were a newly-wed couple, or a master and servant turned
lovey-dovey. The practice lasted only for a few days but we continued
blushing when praised by each other on social media. It felt strange
that this equation stayed only as long as my sexuality was not declared.
After that, the compliments stopped, and the attraction was reduced to
awkward hi-s in the college canteen where we couldn’t entirely avoid
each other. When I came out to a college junior the next year, he said
“You’re not into me, are you? I’m straight, okay?” My experience with
straight men taught me that they had a lot of anxiety around handling
the eroticism within a friendship. It was especially difficult when this
attraction was not in tandem with the fact that they were ‘straight’.
They feared coming to terms with their own sexuality, which is sometimes
more fluid than a sexual label can hold. It was far more ambiguous, and
did not follow social rules. I did not have these conversations with
them because I feared homophobia. I could get punched in the face for
being ‘indecent’ and giving that desire a name. That being said, there
were several boys in college who I came close to. Maybe they felt
towards me something similar to what I felt with Anchal? But it was
difficult to grapple with, since they did not have the language for it.
Perhaps they did not know that eroticism could exist without sexual
intercourse and could be acknowledged instead of repressed
My bisexual friend Suyash had had different experiences though, where
eroticism made his friendship with a straight man stronger. “I met
Tanveer, and found him interesting in the beginning, but not attractive.
He was also intimidating, like most cis-het men around,” Suyash told
me. “We started hanging out a lot and then I found out that it’s okay to
be myself around him. That’s how we got closer. Once that intimidation
goes, attraction comes. Our friendship grew, in a
pure-and-pious-friendship waala way. My desire for him also grew after
that. There was a situation where I had to shift residence, but I did
not want to go to his flat. He eventually made me move in with him,
after emotional calls and blocking all other options. ‘Nahi jayega tu,
aur kisi ke saath nahi jayega. Come live with me only,’ he would say. I
came out to him. Despite him knowing that I’m attracted to him, he
continued to provide comfort to me. I mean straight guys are generally
scared away by that, but our friendship remained unchanged and full of
love.”
With LGBTQ+ friends, I found it much easier to inhabit the undefined.
To not name a desire or a friendship, to let them bloom together and
fill the space in between. They have created a new meaning of love for
me, one without inherent expectations or pre-decided rules, each worthy
of cherishing. I found a reflection of this in what another queer friend
Raman, a law student at Gujarat National Law University, said to me
about what bonds him and his female friends. “One of my friends, she is
in a different university. We are exploring. She knows I’m gay and
everything. We do every fucking thing which typical “couples” do. Like
we are not in a relationship and she knows I’m not into girls and
everything, but she loves exploring in bed with me and I like it too. I
don’t know how to explain this to you, but it’s a different kind of sex,
not fully only in the physical thing. We tell each other about our
hook-ups. I ask her to tell me what satisfies her and everything, so I
can. We are very close to each other and there is no shame. Just to tell
you, I’m not itna comfortable with guys, even though I like them
sexually. But these girls are not expecting anything from me, so that
makes us comfortable about our bodies. We are so open! Somewhere I feel
that girls are more accepting, they are more sensitive, so even though I
like guys sexually these women are much more warm and close. I don’t
like talking to straight guys because they always think I’m hitting on
them and make fun like that. They are so fragile, so insecure about
being around a gay man, because what if they like it? I have started
identifying as queer now, because I think my affection towards her is
queer. I don’t think we can set norms. that in a friendship you can not
have this or you can not have that. It’s a mutual understanding.” All
friendships are different, and measuring them by the same scale doesn’t
help.
Anamika and Kriya, two Hijra friends from Lucknow, live that reality.
“Kabhi ye meri husband bann jati hain aur kabhi main inki husband bann
jaati hu”, remarks Kriya, wrapping their hands around Anamika’s
shoulders. They said that the few men who do want to have sexual
relationships with them mostly want them as ‘the second woman’. They are
never accepted as legitimate partners, and seen as less than women
because they are both from the Hijra community. There is no eroticism in
their sexual relationships with men. In fact, friendship is the only
relation that makes the erotic possible for them. It has not only helped
them navigate the world more confidently, but created new notions of
love that are necessary for survival. How would the world with all its
regulations and norms categorize these relationships? Are they married
to each other? Or is this how friendships work? Suyash also added,
“Friend-zone is such a negative term. It takes away so much from the
bond I have with someone. All these terms come with their own boxes.”
These boundaries give our life order, but deprive us of deeper, more
complex relationships, sometimes disrespecting those bonds as less than.
I have come to understand that there are all kinds of imaginations of
friendship beyond its narrow definition. Queering love means that we
escape (or shun) the hierarchy of relationships and live in our own
realities. Why should kissing be reserved only for romance? What if our
erotic relationships with friends are more than, or as important as
sexual experiences with partners? What will it take to make space for
different kinds of companionships, outside the compartments that are
built for us; pleasures different from designated pleasures? What new
worlds will greet us when we dare to name these ‘loves’?
Aditya Vikram spends mornings writing poems in a windowless room and evenings dancing on the terrace. Most of their work revolves around the aftermath of loss, negotiations of filial love, and the freedoms of queerness. They are currently pursuing a Master’s in English at Ashoka University.